Skip to content
You Stopped Investing in FY26. But You Didn't Stop Trading. NSE's Data Proves It.
daily news

You Stopped Investing in FY26. But You Didn't Stop Trading. NSE's Data Proves It.

Venkateshwar JambulaVenkateshwar Jambula//11 min read

₹33,537 crore.

That is all Indian retail investors put into equities in FY26, through February 28. The previous year, it was ₹1.59 lakh crore. A 79% collapse in fresh equity investment, according to NSE's own data.

Read that number again. Nearly four out of every five rupees that retail investors were putting into stocks simply vanished from the cash market.

Now read this one: 38.9 lakh. That is the number of individual traders active in the equity derivatives segment in February 2026. Up from 34.8 lakh in December 2025. The highest F&O participation in 14 months.

You stopped investing. You did not stop gambling.

Why Did Retail Investors Pull Back From Equities in FY26?

The easy answer: March 2026 was a bloodbath. The Sensex dropped 11.5%. FIIs pulled over ₹1.14 lakh crore. Brent crude crossed $115. The Iran war sent the rupee to 92 against the dollar. ₹51 lakh crore in market capitalisation evaporated in a single month.

But the pullback started before March. Cash market participation fell every month from December to February. Individual investors were already leaving equities before the crash made headlines.

The NSE report is specific: individual investor participation in the cash market fell from 1.34 crore in December 2025 to 1.33 crore in January and 1.26 crore in February. That is 8 lakh investors who stopped buying stocks across three months, during a period when Nifty was still above 22,000 for most of it.

This was not panic selling. This was something quieter. A loss of conviction. Earnings were weak. Valuations looked stretched. Global news was bad. So retail investors did what felt rational: they stopped putting new money into equities.

Except they did not stop taking risk. They redirected it.

Where Did the Risk Go? Straight Into F&O.

The derivatives segment tells the opposite story. While the cash market emptied, F&O participation climbed every single month. December: 34.8 lakh. January: 35.8 lakh. February: 38.9 lakh. A 12% increase in just three months, hitting the highest level since December 2024.

This is not investors hedging their existing portfolios. If it were, equity investment would be flat or rising alongside F&O activity. Instead, equity investment collapsed while F&O surged. The two lines moved in opposite directions.

The behavioral explanation is uncomfortable: Indian retail investors did not become more cautious in FY26. They became more impatient. Equities felt too slow, too uncertain, too painful after a year of flat-to-negative returns. F&O offered what equities could not: the possibility of making it all back in a single trade.

SEBI's September 2024 study showed that 93% of individual F&O traders lost money between FY22 and FY24. Aggregate losses exceeded ₹1.8 lakh crore over three years. In FY25 alone, individual net losses widened by 41% to ₹1.05 lakh crore.

The same traders who pulled money OUT of equities were pouring more activity INTO the instrument with a 93% loss rate.

What Three Biases Are Driving This Shift?

This is not stupidity. It is predictable psychology, three biases operating simultaneously.

After losing money in equities, your brain screams: do something. Sitting with a red portfolio feels like failure. Trading, even if it generates more losses, feels like taking control. A study published in the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making found that investors under stress make 67% more transactions than their baseline, and those extra transactions underperform by an average of 3.2% annually.

Buying and holding an index fund during a downturn is statistically the better strategy. But it does not feel productive. Trading Bank Nifty options on expiry day feels like you are fighting back. That feeling is the action bias at work.

The pain of losing ₹1 lakh in equities hurts roughly twice as much as the pleasure of gaining ₹1 lakh. Kahneman and Tversky quantified this asymmetry in 1979. After FY26's equity losses, your brain codes "equity investment" as the source of pain. The rational move is to recognize that the market is cyclical and valuations are now more reasonable (Nifty PE dropped to 19.6x, the lowest since 2022). The emotional move is to avoid the instrument that hurt you.

But avoiding equities does not reduce your risk appetite. It just redirects it. F&O feels different because the instruments are different, the time horizon is shorter, and the account might even be separate in your broker app. Your brain files it under a different mental category.

This is where it gets ugly. Mental accounting, a concept Daniel Kahneman and Richard Thaler both documented, lets you compartmentalize money. Your "investment portfolio" is one mental bucket. Your "trading account" is another. Losses in one do not feel like they affect the other.

So when your equity portfolio drops 15% in March, you feel the loss deeply. But when you lose ₹30,000 on a Bank Nifty weekly option, it registers as a "trading cost," not a portfolio loss. Same money. Same bank account. Different emotional weight.

PortoAI's behavioral fingerprint system breaks through this illusion. It shows your combined P&L across equities and derivatives, in one number, from one dashboard. No separate buckets. No mental accounting tricks. Just: this is what you made. This is what you lost. This is what it cost.

Is the STT Hike Making Any Difference?

From April 1, 2026, the government raised STT on futures from 0.02% to 0.05% and on options from 0.10% to 0.15%. SEBI's algo trading framework became mandatory. The stated goal: reduce speculative churn among retail traders.

Early signs are mixed. The February 2026 F&O participation data (38.9 lakh) was collected before the STT hike took effect. April and May data will reveal whether higher costs actually deter trading or simply cut into already-negative returns.

History is not encouraging. SEBI raised STT in July 2024 as well. The NSE F&O business growth data showed a temporary dip in volumes followed by a full recovery within three months. Price elasticity works differently when the primary motivation is emotional rather than economic.

If you are trading F&O because you want to "make back" what equities took, a ₹502 increase per Nifty futures lot is not going to change your mind. The compulsion is stronger than the cost.

PortoAI's overtrading detection tracks this at the individual level. It measures your trade frequency against your own baseline. If you traded twice a week in FY25 and now trade eight times a week in April 2026, that spike is flagged regardless of what the market or SEBI says. Your behaviour changed. That is the signal.

What Does Your Own Data Say? Five Questions to Ask.

Forget the NSE aggregate numbers for a moment. Here is how to check whether you are exhibiting the same pattern:

1. Compare your FY25 vs FY26 equity purchases. Open your Zerodha or Groww trade history. Count the number of equity delivery buys in FY25 versus FY26. If FY26 is less than half of FY25, you pulled back from investing.

2. Compare your FY25 vs FY26 F&O trade count. Same exercise, but for futures and options. If FY26 is higher than FY25, you traded more while investing less. That is the pattern.

3. Check your F&O hit rate. Of all F&O trades in FY26, what percentage were profitable? If it is below 40%, you are not trading with an edge. You are buying lottery tickets.

4. Look at your expiry-day concentration. What percentage of your options trades happened on or within two days of expiry? If it is above 50%, you are gambling on time decay rather than directional conviction.

5. Calculate your combined P&L. Add your equity losses and F&O losses into one number. Not separate accounts. One total. This is what the mental accounting bias hides from you.

PortoAI runs these exact calculations automatically when you connect your Zerodha or Groww account. The portfolio checkup shows your combined P&L, trade frequency trends, and behavioral patterns in one view. No spreadsheets. No manual calculation.

What Should You Actually Do Right Now?

The market rallied 2,000 points on April 1. Iran de-escalation, crude oil softening, value buying at oversold levels. Your brain is now processing a new signal: "see, the worst is over." That signal will push you to trade more aggressively, not less.

Before you place your next trade, answer one question: am I buying this equity because the valuation is reasonable and I have a 3-year horizon? Or am I buying this F&O contract because I want to recover March losses by Friday?

The first is investing. The second is the exact pattern that NSE's data just documented across 38.9 lakh Indian traders.

If you cannot tell the difference in real time, that is precisely the problem PortoAI solves. The casino mode alert triggers when your trading pattern shifts from structured to speculative. It does not judge you. It shows you the data and asks: did you mean to do this?

₹33,537 crore in equities. ₹1.05 lakh crore in F&O losses. That is FY26 in two numbers. The question for FY27 is which number you want to be part of.

Connect your Zerodha or Groww account. See your equity-vs-F&O split, trade frequency, and behavioral patterns in one dashboard.

Try PortoAI Free

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did retail equity investment fall in FY26?

According to NSE's FY26 report, retail equity investment through the cash market segment fell to Rs 33,537 crore, down from Rs 1.59 lakh crore in FY25. That is a 79% decline. Individual investor participation in the cash market also dropped from 1.34 crore in December 2025 to 1.26 crore by February 2026, a steady month-on-month decline.

Why did F&O participation increase despite equity investment falling?

F&O participation rose from 34.8 lakh traders in December 2025 to 38.9 lakh in February 2026, the highest in 14 months. This happened because retail investors did not become more cautious. They shifted their risk-taking from equities (where losses are slow and visible) to derivatives (where losses are fast but feel like they offer a quick recovery). Loss aversion drives this: after losing money in equities, the brain seeks faster paths to recover, and F&O feels like the shortcut.

Is it irrational to trade F&O while reducing equity investment?

It depends on the reason. If you reduced equity because valuations were stretched and you are using F&O to hedge existing positions, that is rational. But if you stopped buying equities because you lost money in March 2026 and started trading more F&O to recover those losses, that is textbook revenge trading. NSE data suggests the latter: retail F&O losses widened to Rs 1.05 lakh crore in FY25, and SEBI's 2024 study showed 93% of individual F&O traders lose money.

What behavioral biases cause investors to shift from investing to trading?

Three biases dominate. Action bias makes you feel that doing something (trading) is better than doing nothing (staying invested). Loss aversion makes you overweight the pain of equity losses and avoid the same instrument. And mental accounting lets you treat your trading account as separate from your investing account, so F&O losses feel like a different category than equity losses. Together, they create the illusion of caution while increasing actual risk.

How does PortoAI detect if someone is replacing investing with gambling?

PortoAI tracks both your equity and F&O activity across Zerodha and Groww. When it detects a pattern where equity buying has dropped significantly but F&O trade frequency has increased, it flags this as a behavioral shift. The casino mode alert triggers when your F&O trades show gambling characteristics: no stop losses, expiry-day concentration, and position sizing that does not match your portfolio. It is designed to catch exactly the pattern NSE's FY26 data reveals at a national level.

Will the April 2026 STT hike reduce F&O speculation?

Unlikely in the short term. SEBI raised STT in July 2024 as well, and F&O volumes recovered within three months. The April 2026 hike raises STT on futures by 150% and on options by 50%, but price sensitivity is low when the motivation is emotional rather than economic. Traders chasing recovery from losses will absorb the higher cost until their accounts hit zero. Structural deterrence requires behavioral intervention, not just higher taxes.